Advisor: Timo Böttcher
It is nothing new, that the digital transformation changes the value creation of firms. Both research and practice are well aware, that digital technology, shifting consumer expectations and the ever increasing dynamicity of environments pose challenges for firms to sustain or build a competitive advantage. For digital platforms, we observe winner-take-all markets, where only few platforms sustain and occupy most of the market share. Network effects are one reason why this is the case.
For creating these network effects, a platform owner needs to know and understand the ecosystem the platform participates in. The platform is dependent on value co-creation with both complementers and customers. For example, Uber itself as a platform does not create value. Only if drivers provide their service and customers demand this service, value is created for all three actors. Hence, Uber needs to understand the interests, challenges and relationships of its ecosystem.
On the other side, Uber (as well as other digital platforms) is considered a disruptive innovation to the taxi industry. The service is easier, simpler, more convenient and last but not least digitally available. The interesting thing, that often is not considered, when analysing the disruptive potential of platforms, are actors on the edge of the ecosystem one hardly thinks about. For example, the airport San Francisco charges taxis a airport fee, when they start a trip from the airport. Therefore, all taxis needed a transponder, so that the airport knew about the trips and could charge the taxi companies. But you cannot force private drivers, such as those offering their service on Uber, to install a transponder in their private car. So the airport nearly lost this value stream.
The research project Knowledge4Retail (https://knowledge4retail.org/en/home-2/) aims to create a digital data platform that enables such innovations based on a digital twin of the store. For such a ”new entrant” into the ecosystem of retail, various open questions for both the platform owner as well as complementors and customers arise as exemplified above. Broadly speaking, the questions are about how such a platform can be successful by leveraging its ecosystem.
The aim of this thesis is to analyze the ecosystem of such a data platform in the retail industry. Therefore, the first step of the thesis is to model the traditional ecosystem by identifying the relevant actors, cluster them into roles and set the into relation. In a second step, emerging roles (e. g. by startups) are added to the ecosystem. The e3-value method is a potentially suitable modelling technique. Third, by conducting expert interviews, workshops with industry experts and focus groups, this ecosystem is validated and more importantly extended towards roles, that are on the edge of the retail ecosystem. These could be mobility providers, cultural institutions or gastronomy. Finally, this extended ecosystem needs to be analyzed with regards to the role of a digital data platform entering this ecosystem. What are value co-creation potentials? What actors are affected both positively and negatively? What are the changes in the individual actors’ business models? The goal is to provide practical recommendations for both digital platforms supporting a sustainable business model of retailers, and retailers evolving towards (partially) digital business models.
- Data collection through desk research, interviews, and workshops
- Qualitative and quantitative data analysis
- Result interpretation with regards to the theory of digital ecosystems, dynamic capabilities, or strategic agility.
- Derivation of practical recommendations for business strategy, in particular for the introduction of a new digital platform into an incumbent ecosystem
- Interest in current topics of digital innovation, digital transformation and business models
- A high degree of autonomy and individual responsibility
- Experience in and willingness to conduct scientific studies
- Structured, reliable, and self-motivated work style
The thesis should be written in English. The context of the thesis can also be altered towards similar ecosystems, such as media or sports. If you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact me directly.
Please send your application including our application form, "Notenauszug" from TUMonline, and CV to email@example.com. Please note that we can only consider applications with complete documents.
Announcement date: 03.11.2020
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure:An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. doi:10.1177/0149206316678451
Benbya, H., Nan, N., Tanriverdi, H., & Yoo, Y. (2020). Complexity and Information Systems Research in the Emerging Digital World. MIS Quarterly.
Bogers, M., Sims, J., & West, J. (2019). What Is an Ecosystem? Incorporating 25 Years of Ecosystem Research. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019, 11080. doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2019.11080abstract
Coltman, T., Tallon, P., Sharma, R., & Queiroz, M. (2015). Strategic IT alignment: twenty-five years on. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 91-100. doi:10.1057/jit.2014.35
Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2013). Embracing Digital Technology: A New Strategic Imperative. Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 1-13.
Hein, A., Böhm, M., Krcmar, H.: Tight and Loose Coupling in Evolving Platform Ecosystems: The Cases of Airbnb and Uber. In: International Conference on Business Information Systems, pp. 295-306. Springer International Publishing, (2018)
Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Setzke, D.S., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., Krcmar, H.: Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets (2019)
Hein, A., Weking, J., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., Krcmar, H.: Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets 29, 503-518 (2019)
Moore, J. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 71, 75-86.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Amsterdam: Osterwalder & Pigneur.
Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M.: Value Cocreation and Value Capture in Digital Platforms. Academy of Management Proceedings 2019, 10450 (2019)
Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Krcmar, H.: Design and Governance of Platform Ecosystems – Key Concepts and Issues for Future Research. ECIS 2016, Istanbul, Turkey (2016)
Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Krcmar, H.: How Platform Governance Changes when Customers Become Developers. Academy of Management Proceedings 2019, 13904 (2019)
Tanriverdi, H., Rai, A., & Venkatraman, N. (2010). Research Commentary—Reframing the Dominant Quests of Information Systems Strategy Research for Complex Adaptive Business Systems. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 822-834. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0317
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003